The Territory Transformation
How Fundraise Up Used BoogieBoard to Transform Territory Planning and Drive Higher Average Sales Prices (ASPs)





"It was the first time that I could confidently visualize all of the different build options and their impact. When we rolled this out to the team, we showed them the build in BoogieBoard. They had never seen a build led with such transparency."
— Jessica Watts, VP of Sales, Fundraise Up
Fundraise Up, the leading donation platform for nonprofits, faced a common challenge for growing SaaS companies: their lack of structured territory management was creating inefficiencies across their expanding sales organization.
Fundraise Up implemented BoogieBoard to help them transition to account-based selling, create balanced territories across different roles and segments, implement transparent assignment rules, and establish a framework for continuous improvement.
"BoogieBoard has transformed how we approach territory planning. It's given us the ability to visualize different build options, create transparent assignments that our team trusts, and align our go-to-market strategy with our account coverage."
TL;DR
-
Fundraise Up was stuck - no account ownership.
-
Reps hoarded accounts, making forecasting and growth planning difficult.
-
BoogieBoard helped design balanced territories.
-
Immediate wins: higher ASP, better BDR efficiency, and tighter cross-functional alignment.
-
Fundraise Up is now running continuous planning.
-
Territory data is influencing sales strategy and product roadmap decisions.
Use Case 1
Accelerating Territory Planning Without RevOps Leadership
The Problem
Fundraise Up understood the importance of strong territories, but ran into serious roadblocks. After failing for multiple quarters, the team hit a boiling point:
- Lost RevOps leader: "We proceeded to lose our RevOps leader. We fumbled around trying to figure out if there was a path to getting this done internally."
- Failed spreadsheet approach: Previous attempts using spreadsheets couldn't visualize territory options effectively.
- Business planning bottleneck: "I was not willing to commit to a hiring plan until we had clear account coverage."
- January deadline: "We have revenue kickoff in January. Obviously we need reps to have their 2025 patches in their hands in January at the very latest."
The Solution
Introduced by their partner, Skaled Consulting, Fundraise Up turned to BoogieBoard’s territory design platform. With less than two months before their deadline, and no time to evaluate multiple vendors, they made the call to move forward.
"We were worried that the demo was too good to be true. The idea that you could click a button and receive a territory design seemed unrealistic."
Despite initial skepticism, they jumped in with BoogieBoard SaaS and quickly realized the impact:
- Simplified process: "When BoogieBoard came in, there was immediate simplicity in our approach that created acceleration."
- Fast implementation: "I don't remember there being an implementation. I connected our admin with BoogieBoard and suddenly we were discussing how to get the upload started."
- Visual territory modeling: "I could confidently visualize all of the different build options and their impact."
- Cross-team translation: "BoogieBoard acted as the appropriate translator between the two teams to get us into a position where we could run a project plan."
The Impact
- Met January deadline: Territories were implemented in time.
- Unblocked 2025 planning: "We made business decisions with confidence because we had visibility into the account universe."
- Built rep trust: "When we rolled this out, we showed them the build in BoogieBoard. They had never seen a build led with such transparency."
Use Case 2
Designing Multi-Tiered Territory Structures
The Problem
Fundraise Up needed to design and coordinate territories across multiple layers and roles, each with unique requirements:
- Different sales roles: AEs and BDRs required distinct but aligned territories.
- Multiple segments: Education, SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise, and Strategic each demanded a tailored approach.
- Varying experience levels: Different quota expectations meant territory sizing had to be customized.
- New geographic markets: Expansion into UK/EMEA added further complexity.
- Current and future teams: Territories needed to support both existing team members and planned hires.
The Solution
Using BoogieBoard’s dynamic territory design platform, Fundraise Up was able to bring structure and balance to a complex set of needs:
- Mirrored territories: Created perfect alignment between BDRs and AEs to ensure streamlined handoffs.
- Micro-vertical specialization: Built dedicated structures for non-profit micro-verticals like Education.
- Quota-based sizing: Adjusted territory sizes based on each rep's quota level for fairness and balance.
- Future hire readiness: Pre-built territories were ready and waiting for incoming hires.
- Segment balance visualization: Visualized account distribution across segments to maintain balance and avoid overlap.
The Impact
- Increased BDR efficiency: Domain specialization led to sharper targeting and improved outreach.
- Streamlined handoffs: Aligned BDR and AE territories eliminated confusion and lead routing errors.
- Fair quota opportunity: "We have tiered AE quotas within a segment. We made sure there's equitability in how the book is balanced."
- Hiring readiness: Territories were ready for new hires, speeding up onboarding and ramp time.
- Eliminated territory disputes: Clear boundaries between roles and segments prevented internal conflicts.
Use Case 3
Transitioning to Account-Based Selling
The Problem
When Jessica Watts joined Fundraise Up as VP of Sales, the company operated without a defined territory structure. Sellers could pick accounts if they weren’t already claimed, and new leads were assigned round-robin. This led to several issues:
- No account ownership: "No AE carried a book of business. No BDR carried a book of business. It was completely round robin based on historical inbound processes."
- Opportunity hoarding: "AEs would hold their opportunities because if they closed them, they would be released back into the round robin. We saw forced holding behavior where AEs were trying to create territories."
- No targeting strategy: "When asked 'who are our targets?' we could not say with confidence."
- Cross-functional confusion: "We couldn't promise (to other departments) that accounts were being worked because they didn't belong to anybody who took responsibility for creating those conversations."
The Solution
Fundraise Up loaded its account data and team structure into BoogieBoard and leveraged its AI-assisted design features to:
- Create structured territories: Assigned specific accounts to individual reps with clear ownership.
- Balance territories: Used revenue potential, micro-sector focus, and nonprofit-specific criteria for fair territory distribution.
- Define ownership boundaries: Established transparent assignment rules and clear lines of ownership.
- Distribute new accounts: Implemented an equitable system for distributing inbound and uncovered accounts.
- Align on TAM strategy: Created a clear, transparent strategy for prioritizing their Total Addressable Market.
The Impact
- Higher ASPs: Fundraise Up sellers are spending their time selling to the right accounts. "We're seeing all channels deliver a stronger ASP because we're pointing them in the right direction."
- Predictable pipeline: Clear account ownership enabled specific expectations for pipeline generation per territory, creating an approach and a measurable baseline.
"The idea that you have 500 accounts per year that are yours, and you must hit a penetration rate within this patch — that ownership was very new."
- Clear accountability: Ownership created new expectations for how reps approached their book of business.
- Eliminated hoarding: Reps stopped artificially holding opportunities open since they maintained ongoing account ownership.
Use Case 4
Building Sales Rep Trust Through Transparency
The Problem
Territory assignments were new to Fundraise Up’s sales team, and leadership knew they would face skepticism:
- Unfamiliar concept: "The concept of territories was new for a lot of our AEs. Many started as BDRs and had never worked on a territory-based patch."
- Fairness concerns: "How do you know that you didn't just give me 500 accounts in verticals with a suboptimal win rate?"
- Unique business model: "We base our segments on potential deal value—how much online revenue we think a nonprofit could drive through us."
- No visibility into methodology: Previous territory assignments lacked clear rationale reps could understand.
- Vertical-specific performance differences: "Our win rate is very different when selling to museums versus when we sell to animal welfare."
The Solution
BoogieBoard enabled the team to bring full transparency and involvement into the territory design process:
- Transparent criteria: All territory design parameters and balancing goals were clearly documented and visible.
- Visual experimentation: "I could ask questions, see how that played out in the build, and then change my mind."
- Real-time balancing: "Let's play around with balancing this way and see what that looks like. Okay, let's balance it differently."
- Data-driven decisions: Territory assignments were based on measurable criteria, not subjective judgment.
- Rep involvement: "We let our AE team in on it with us. We asked, 'what criteria would you be most concerned about us getting right?'"
The Impact
- Rep confidence: "AEs had a high degree of confidence because we were all able to visualize the same scenarios."
- Evidence-based responses: "We had really clean 'whys' to share. When asked 'did you consider doing it this way?' we could say 'we actually modeled it that way and it looked like this, which we didn't prefer.'"
"The idea that we could sit with the team and show them exactly how we built their territories—down to the criteria—was a game changer."
- Eliminated perceived favoritism: Data-driven assignments removed concerns about subjective decisions.
- Faster adoption: Transparency led to quicker buy-in from the sales team.
Use Case 5
Quarterly Territory Planning Instead of Annual
The Problem
Jessica's assessment: "One of the most immature ways to look at territory design is as something that happens once a year." As time marches on, territories become:
- Quickly outdated: "As reps close, lose, or disqualify opportunities, that new data needs to be applied to territories."
- Changing market insight: "We've already disclosed new insights around what is a great account to win now versus later when our product roadmap matures."
- No adjustment mechanism: There was no process to refine territories as new information emerged.
- Strategy disconnection: "Your territories are your go-to-market strategy implemented into a system." Without updates, strategy couldn't evolve.
- Product-market fit misalignment: "Your territory should represent your sales addressable market, not your total addressable market." Without updates, territories included accounts that weren't actually saleable.
The Solution
BoogieBoard unlocked ongoing territory design and management, helping Fundraise Up build a more adaptive go-to-market strategy:
- Regular verification: "How do we come back quarterly and say, 'are our assumptions holding up?'"
- Integrity checks: "Are we still dealing with a patch of integrity or are adjustments needed to make sure the AE can deliver their number?"
- Data updates: "How do we pop that open in April and say, 'were our assumptions correct?'"
- Strategic refinement: "We should go back to those builds in Q2 and put new data on top to create even more focus."
The Impact
- Maintained territory integrity: Ongoing balance adjustments kept territories effective throughout the year.
- Evolved strategy: "Your territories are your go-to-market strategy. It's how you create focus in the field." Regular reviews allowed strategy evolution.
- Increased rep confidence: Sales reps knew imbalances would be addressed quarterly rather than annually.
- Market intelligence: "In the build, our mid-market looked right. Enterprise looked about right. Strategic, we under-delivered—our model over-assumed the number of accounts in that segment."
- Product roadmap alignment: The ongoing process reveals which accounts weren't actually sellable based on current product capabilities, allowing better focus on true sales addressable market.
"One of the most immature ways to look at territory design is as something that happens once a year."
Long-Term Impact
Long-Term Impact on Fundraise Up's Go-to-Market Approach
Fundraise Up's territory transformation created lasting changes that continue to drive their go-to-market success:
- Product-territory alignment: "We've found we need more specific data sets... We've learned what data sets we need to build for that next degree of specificity."
- Focus on sales addressable market: "Your territory should represent your sales addressable market, not your total addressable market. We're starting to designate feature requirements onto our account objects so we can filter on that dataset."
- Financial planning credibility: The territory structure provided the confidence needed to commit to headcount plans, creating a direct link between territory integrity and financial forecasts.
- Data-driven improvement: "We placed KPIs on this entire exercise. Year over year, our builds will get better if we can increase qualification rates and ASPs."
- Quick territory adjustments: The team can quickly identify and correct territory imbalances when needed.
- Better onboarding: Pre-built territories for incoming team members accelerate productivity for new hires.
As Fundraise Up continues to grow, their data-driven territory approach has become a core element of their go-to-market strategy. In Jessica Watts' words:
"This process gave us a unit of measurement that we previously lacked. Now we can say: the bullseye that we designed the territory around looks like this. Are we hitting it?"
Fundraise Up’s Territory Transformation at a Glance
- Balanced Territories in Weeks: Achieved faster territory rollout with BoogieBoard’s AI-assisted design.
- Cross-Functional Alignment: Sales, marketing, and partnerships executed against the same territory strategy.
- Increased Sales Productivity: Higher ASPs, faster BDR ramp time, and improved rep confidence.
- Ongoing Territory Optimization: Moved from annual territory design to quarterly reviews and adjustments.
- Data-Driven Decision Making: Established KPIs for territory performance and tied territories directly to product strategy and financial planning.